Skip to content

🏆 Be Healthy is now a Gracie Award–Winning Newsletter → Explore it now

AI Can Be Your Sounding Board—but It Should Not Choose Your Path

AI Can Be Your Sounding Board—but It Should Not Choose Your Path

By Parul Somani
Copy to clipboard M389.2 48h70.6L305.6 224.2 487 464H345L233.7 318.6 106.5 464H35.8L200.7 275.5 26.8 48H172.4L272.9 180.9 389.2 48zM364.4 421.8h39.1L151.1 88h-42L364.4 421.8z
Parul Somani on why our most important decisions cannot be determined by an algorithm.
audio-thumbnail
Listen to this article.
0:00
/505.853175

I spent my thirty-first birthday in Napa, sitting in the back of a keynote session at a company off-site, quietly holding back tears.

Nearly a decade into a consulting career I had once been proud of, something had shifted. The work was intellectually stimulating, the firm prestigious, and the path forward predictable. On paper, everything made sense. Yet sitting there that day, exhausted from years of relentless travel, client demands, and sleepless nights as a new mother, I realized I could no longer explain to myself why I was still on that path.

By the time the off-site ended, the realization had crystallized into something unavoidable: I was burned out.

I didn’t yet know what I would do next. I only knew that continuing on the same trajectory felt misaligned with the life I wanted to live.

If I were facing that moment today, I suspect I would do what many professionals now do when confronting uncertainty: I would turn to AI.

I might start with practical questions.

Should I leave a stable career when I don’t have a clear next step?

What do people typically do after consulting?

How risky is it to walk away from a well-paying job?

Within seconds, an algorithm could generate a thoughtful response. It might outline career options, summarize research on burnout, and suggest frameworks for evaluating trade-offs. It could even analyze patterns across thousands of professionals who had faced similar crossroads.

The answers would likely be helpful. But they wouldn’t solve the real problem.

Because when people consult AI in moments like these, they’re rarely searching for information alone. More often, they’re searching for reassurance.

They want the algorithm to confirm that their instincts are correct. That leaving is reasonable. That staying is safer. That there is a “right” answer waiting to be discovered if they simply gather enough data.

But life’s most meaningful decisions rarely work that way.

In leadership and in life, the hardest choices are rarely constrained by a lack of information. They are constrained by a lack of certainty.

Should you leave the job that looks successful from the outside but feels draining on the inside?

Should you pivot industries after years of building expertise in one field?

Should you pursue a vision others don’t yet understand?

You can collect data, consult advisors, and run scenario analyses. But eventually, you still arrive at the same uncomfortable truth: the outcome cannot be guaranteed.

This is where many high achievers get stuck.

Trained to optimize decisions through analysis, they search endlessly for the perfect answer. They gather more data, consult more experts, and explore more scenarios, hoping that one more piece of information will eliminate the uncertainty.

Instead, the opposite happens. The abundance of input amplifies the complexity. Decision paralysis sets in.

I didn’t fully understand this dynamic when I left consulting. It was only years later—during the most consequential decision of my life—that the lesson became unmistakably clear.

At thirty-one, shortly after the birth of my second daughter, I was diagnosed with aggressive breast cancer. Suddenly I was faced with choosing a treatment plan that would shape my future—and possibly determine whether I would live to see my daughters grow up.

I approached the decision the way I had been trained: gather data, analyze the options, and compare probabilities. I read medical studies, spoke with multiple specialists, and carefully evaluated the trade-offs between treatment approaches.

But no amount of analysis could answer the question that mattered most.

There was no model that could guarantee which path would save my life.

The realization was both terrifying and clarifying. I would have to make this decision without certainty.

That experience forced me to rethink how decisions are made when outcomes are unknowable. And it ultimately led me to develop what I now call the Path of Least Regret framework.

Instead of asking, which option guarantees the best outcome? the question shifts to something more powerful:

Which choice aligns most closely with my values, priorities, and intentions today—so that I can live with the decision regardless of how things unfold?

This reframing changes the goal of decision-making. The objective is no longer to eliminate uncertainty. It is to create peace of mind.

When people apply this lens, something remarkable happens. The noise quiets. The endless comparison of hypothetical futures becomes less important than understanding what truly matters in the present.

And this is where AI can be incredibly useful—but also where its limits become clear.

AI can help you explore possibilities.

It can surface perspectives you might not have considered.

It can help you think more rigorously about trade-offs.

In that sense, it can be an excellent sounding board.

But it cannot determine your values.

It cannot decide what trade-offs you are willing to live with.

And it cannot tell you which decision will allow you to look back years from now with peace of mind.

Only you can answer those questions.

As artificial intelligence becomes more integrated into our professional lives, leaders will increasingly rely on algorithms to inform strategy, analyze risk, and generate insight. These capabilities will be transformative.

But we must be careful not to outsource something more fundamental: the responsibility for choosing our path.

Because the most important decisions we make—about our careers, our health, our relationships, and our purpose—are not optimization problems.

They are reflections of who we are and what we value.

AI can illuminate the road ahead. It can help us see options more clearly.

But the path of least regret is something each of us must ultimately choose for ourselves.

Parul Somani is a decision strategist, keynote speaker, author, and mindset coach. Her debut book, The Path of Least Regret, provides a roadmap for navigating uncertainty and change with clarity and confidence. Learn more about her and her work here.

The Path of Least Regret: Decide with Clarity. Move Forward with Confidence.
Shop on Bookshop & Support local book stores Shop on Amazon Shop the Audiobook Narrated by the Author

Please note that we may receive affiliate commissions from the sales of linked products.

Device with Maria Shriver Sunday Paper